The current guidelines recommend 150 to 300 minutes of moderate intensity exercise per week. According to the World Health Organization, this can lead up to a 40% reduction of cardiovascular disease. However, 36% of Americans claim that they do no have any time for leisure or exercise activity.
A new study now shows, that even a simple daily walk can provide unexpected health benefits. With 2700 steps per day you can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease by 11%. And if you mount 7200 steps, the risk of cardiovascular disease can be reduced up to 50%. Speed it up a little bit and you get additional benefits in each category, independent from the number of steps per day.
How does exercise accomplish that? By improving blood pressure, insulin resistance, glucose metabolism, lipid profile, blood viscosity - which leads to less tendency of clotting, and reduction of inflammation, which was shown in the CANTOS Trial to be a powerful risk factor for the development of heart attacks.
Exercise also has a positive effect on mood and depression. It is like chocolate for the brain.
So, what are you waiting for?
Now, this is,
Simply Smarter Health.
Hypertension, or high blood pressure is the most important modifiable risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASVD). ASVD includes coronary artery disease, which can lead to heart attacks, carotid artery disease, which can lead to strokes, and peripheral vascular disease, which can lead to limb loss. Nevertheless, it is one of the most underdiagnosed and undertreated risk factors.
For decades, salt has been considered a major contributor to hypertension. The majority of clinical trials strongly support such association. In 2001, the DASH-Sodium trial revealed that there is a synergistic positive effect on blood pressure reduction with the DASH diet, which was originally published in 1997 as an overall healthy lifestyle diet with emphasis on fruits, vegetables, and low-fat. This in itself led to a blood pressure reduction. With a restriction of sodium in the diet, there were further beneficial effects on both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
In a separate study, the higher the starting blood pressure was, the more effective sodium restriction was.
Just presented at the American Heart Association Meeting, another cross-overstudy, (CARDIA-SSBP), showed that participants on a low sodium diet had a reduction of blood pressure. Once they switched to the second arm of the trial with a high sodium diet, there was an increase of blood pressure. The changes were significant and independent of age, sex, race, baseline blood pressure, or diabetes, and obesity.
High sodium ingestion by itself seems to have a deleterious effect on the vascular function with vascular stiffness, and independent of high blood pressure on the development of heart muscle thickness and loss of elasticity.
Both are viewed as risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
In summary, if we accept the fact that high blood pressure is the largest modifiable risk factor for heart disease, and if we accept the results from multiple sodium/salt trials demonstrating deleterious effects on hypertension, then we can deduce that a high sodium intake is a strong contributor to the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease.
To me, the data goes beyond just an observational association, but rather is a causative correlation. Nonetheless, the critics will argue that there is no hard data proving that salt is a cause of myocardial infarction, strokes, and cardiovascular death, or death from other causes. I think, the cause and effect is hardly arguable. The results, however, are not seen overnight, but over the years.
Ozempic and Wegovy are probably the best known medications on the market and on social media. They were initially developed for the treatment of diabetes. However, it was also discovered that it can significantly reduce body weight. Thus, it has been the most sought after medication for weight loss, irrespective of its primary indication for diabetes.
The medication has a pleotropic affect, the biology of which is still not completely understood. In the SELECT trial, presented at the American Heart Association meeting, the Semaglutide reduced heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death by 20% in nondiabetic patients with prior myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure. Although the weight loss was also significant, it is unlikely that the risk reduction of heart attack or stroke was just related to the weight loss alone. There was also a marked reduction of the inflammatory marker CRP, which is known to be associated with coronary artery disease.
Nonetheless, it is well known that weight reduction, particularly significant weight reduction between 10 to 15% of body weight, which can be accomplished with those drugs as well as with bariatric surgeries, has a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk factors and was shown in a sub-analysis in the LOOK AHEAD trial to result in reduction of cardiovascular events.
Regardless of the pharmacological details, this drug, now approved for weight loss under the name of Wegovy, which was used in this trial, will have growing and widening indications in the treatment of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular and renal diseases.
However, I would caution, to view this medication as a miracle fountain for health and weight loss, and disregard the very important role, you the patient have to play in attaining health, including proper diet, cardiovascular exercise, no smoking, high blood pressure, and cholesterol (lipids) management. These are all classical risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Your routine may be different, but after I get up, and do my basic hygiene, I head to the kitchen, grab my Italian mocha pot, the classic one, which is essentially in every Italian household, and brew myself two cups of Italian style coffee, which permeates the kitchen with a wonderful aroma. I don't use any fancy coffee beans, just regular dark or medium roast, often, whatever is available at my local Costco store. The mocha pot is the average Joe's stove top "Espresso" coffee maker. Nothing fancy, $40-$50 will get you one. It is actually not a real espresso pot, as it doesn't make a crema, the characteristic dense foam layer, generated only with high pressure and high dollar espresso machines. But, the taste is still delightful. I prefer it to a drip coffee, although any style would be okay to prepare. I take it black - it has a lovely bitterness, however, sometimes I have a couple of walnuts and maybe a banana or a date with it; which mellows the bitterness and creates a pleasing flavor contrast for the taste buds. If you want to try a piece of dark chocolate with it, go for it; a doughnut? - I’ll give you that, but no more than once a week.
A couple minutes after the 1st cup, I feel a little buzz in my head, and my senses are being activated. It is almost like shifting into a higher gear. So, not only does it taste good, but it also has the caffeine driven energizing effect. As a matter of fact, legend has it, that the coffee plant was discovered around the 9th century by accident by an Ethiopian Goatherd, who noticed his goats being hyperactive after eating the coffee berries. This story, although funny, is not really historically firm. It was not until the 15th century that coffee began to be roasted into similar product, as we know it today. Nonetheless, the buzz and the satisfaction lasts for a couple hours, and around 11 o'clock in the morning, I usually have a little dip in my adrenaline level and crave another cup. Addiction? Maybe a little bit, but not a bad one.
I have had this routine for years, but not until recently have I learned, that coffee, as well as tea, have a real health benefit. In recent years, many high quality clinical studies have been published about coffee and tea, and across-the-board, they have all revealed beneficial effects on cardio-metabolic diseases. More specifically, habitual coffee drinking is associated with improved glucose metabolism, and reduction of the risk of diabetes by virtue of improving insulin sensitivity and reducing glucose release from the liver, just to name a few. The risk of dying, and specifically from cardiovascular diseases, is also significantly (10-20%) reduced. The thinking is, that many of the bio-active substances in coffee, like the polyphenols and flavonoids, have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Nowadays, we know that inflammation is a major part of chronic metabolic and cardiovascular diseases so such effect is quite plausible.
Many of you guys, and this is true for some physicians as well, are still experiencing the knee-jerk reaction that coffee might be detrimental in heart disease, raise blood pressure, and cause various rhythm disturbances. For habitual coffee drinkers, all of the above has been shown not to be the case. Now, there is a caveat to it, sporadic coffee drinkers who suddenly ingest a significant amount of caffeine may occasionally experience elevated heart rate, elevated blood pressure, and perception of heart pounding. In certain patients who have known arrhythmias, a sudden surge in stimulant level provided by caffeine could trigger an episode. However, in habitual coffee drinkers, there has been no association with an increased risk of heart events; such as angina (chest pain), heart failure, arrhythmias, or death, even if one already has underlying coronary artery disease or arrhythmias. Nothing in this world is 100% so, if you are the rare person who experiences such an exaggerated response to coffee (especially caffeinated), you may want to try to switch to decaffeinated or decaffeinated instant coffee. You will still derive the same benefits since it is known that the reduction of metabolic and cardiovascular problems are not related to caffeine, but highly likely to the approximately 100 bioactive substances i.e. Polyphenols and antioxidants, which are still present in decaffeinated brew.
If you enjoy coffee and the taste of it, then jump on the bandwagon, but avoid adding high amounts of sugar, creamers, artificial sweeteners, or full fat dairy i.e. heavy cream or half and half excessively. These, although they are delectable additives, will negate the heart healthy effects of coffee and tea.
It is also of interest, that many habitual coffee drinkers are also smokers. I hear it all the time, “I have to have my cigarette with my morning cup of coffee.” Such combo has been linked to increased risk of lung disease and cancer, not from the coffee, but from the cigarette. The coffee will not save you. So there's only one thing to do - ditch the cigarette and have an extra cup of coffee.
One more caveat: Coffee has substances, more present in unfiltered coffee, called diterpenes; which were found in research to raise total cholesterol. However, the clinical significance of this is unclear and I, personally, doubt it is of any relevance since all published studies in reputable peer reviewed journals reveal beneficial effects on cardiovascular incidence and mortality as well as plaque formation in coronary arteries; as assessed by calcium score. This is regardless of the type of brew. Although cholesterol (particularly the bad cholesterol; LDL) is obviously an important risk factor for plaque formation (blockages) in the arteries, we are also learning now that not all cholesterol (bad or good) is equal and that sub-classes may have different clinical gravity on plaque development. So, across-the-board, the net-effect is a benefit.
When compared to filtered and unfiltered coffee, it appears that the filter reduces the amount of diterpenes, however, that is dependent on the size of the pores in the paper filter as well as the ground coarseness of your coffee. If you want to be on the more safe side, use paper filter. Although I am a cardiologist, I stick with my Italian mocha pot.
If you don't like coffee, try tea, black or green, it has very similar antioxidants and polyphenols, and a recent, large, Chinese population study showed a 20% reduction in cardiovascular mortality in frequent tea drinkers, as well as a longer life. How much tea or coffee? It appears that two to four cups per day is probably the golden middle ground.
So raise your cup, cheers, and enjoy!
You may be thinking, what an absurd topic in the midst of the holiday season. I am okay with you returning to this vignette in January. But, for now, as you digest your desert, just glance over it.
Intermittent fasting or time restricted eating is actually a natural phenomenon and dates back to prehistoric times. From evolutionary perspective, it has not been until modern times with abundance of unlimited food availability and immediate gratification of cravings, that a 24/7 eating has evolved. In prehistoric society, most of the day was spent with gathering food, either through hunting or agriculturally, and nourishment was set typically at two specific times of the day.
Intermittent fasting, by virtue of what it is by definition, leads to reduced caloric intake. The resurgence of interest is strongly driven by social media as a weight loss program. It actually is not a weight loss program at all. It is a structured eating style with multitude of health benefits. In comparison with non-time restricted eating with same amount of calories consumed, it has no significant edge for weight loss over non-time restricted eating.
And here are the real benefits: In multiple clinical trials, both in experimental animals and humans, it has been documented, that time restricted eating, typically with a 16 : 8 ratio, taking two meals in eight hour and fasting for the remaining 16 hour, leads to significant improvement of metabolic parameters, including insulin resistance, reduction of intra-abdominal fat, lipid metabolism, systemic inflammation and reduction of diastolic blood pressure.
Under normal circumstances with abundance of food available, the body utilizes mainly glucose for energy production. However, after a 12 to 16 hour of fasting, the body has used up all glycogen storages from the liver and switches to utilization of fatty acids for production of energy, generating ketone bodies as energy supply particularly for the brain. During those times, insulin levels are low, which over time improves insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism.
Recent studies seem to support further benefits by linking time restricted eating to the circadian rhythm and consuming the largest of the two meals in the morning rather than late in the afternoon.
The time restricted eating is a 24 hour regiment, however there are others, which stretch over several days, often in a 5:2 ratio, with two days of fasting and three days of unrestricted eating. Further benefits are derived by eating healthy foods, like in the Mediterranean or DASH diet.
Although in short clinical trials the above benefits are undeniable, the question remains, whether this approach is sustainable against all temptations of our modern society, and if sustained for long time, will it actually improve cardiovascular outcomes. These are open questions. In the interim, it definitely has benefits particularly for people with prediabetes, diabetes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome. And since it is associated with reduction of consumed calories, it may lead to some weight loss, which by itself reduces systemic inflammation as another risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis.
As you are making New Year’s resolutions, make one more. Perhaps the most important one. Develop purpose in life.
I wish all of you lots of health not only next year but in years to come. And together we are working on getting this accomplished. Some of you are timing your retirement with the end of the year, and quite a few of my patients have planned on doing so. Interestingly, however, when talking to them about their plans and how they intend to spend their time, which now would seem limitless with no particular direction or constraints, only few have a concrete idea as what to do with themselves. You have heard the slogan "bored to death"…. And this is what the next few paragraphs are about.
Based on my personal experience with patients as well as clinical trials, for overall health and longevity, it is important to develop a purpose in one's life, particularly after retirement, when one is suddenly torn from an environment of some meaningful daily existence, even if the job might not have been fully satisfying. Being in the workforce creates a reason for daily getting up and having a place to go, being in a social structure outside the family and having some appreciation and recognition for the work and contribution performed.
With retirement, this abruptly ends and leaves a void, which could become dangerously deep and unfulfilling. Studies have shown, that elderly people with no purpose or very little purpose in life compared to people with high levels of purpose in life, this being productivity of some sort, second carrier, or hobbies which a person passionately pursues, have up to three times (3x) higher mortality rates and thus significant reduction in life expectancy. This is also true for physical and mental perception of one's health and well-being. The most common causes of death were due to cardiovascular disease, cancers and gastrointestinal illnesses. Death was also more prevalent in people who were physically inactive, had low functional status and were current or previous smokers.
It is therefore extraordinarily important particularly when retirement is planned, to start developing such strategies of purpose early, in order to eliminate such void and emptiness, which could lead to mental stresses, depression, overeating, and excessive alcohol consumption. Being part of social structures is very important, not only for one’s own support, but also to meaningfully engage in them and possibly even become a driver of social and group activities.
So, for overall health and sensation of well-being and long life, it is not only important to stick with healthy lifestyle but to also develop meaningful values of daily living. Overall health is not reflected in good laboratory values, but in personal fulfillment and satisfaction with every single day. After all, it is the high quality of life we strive for, not just high chronological age. If you're looking forward tonight to get up in the morning and engage in joyful activities, and at the end of the day say – it was a good day – then you're on the right track.
If you read our website, there is a good chance, that you have a stent in your coronary arteries. The conceptual idea about opening a blocked artery goes back to the 1960s and then in 1977, the first coronary intervention with inflatable balloons inside the coronary artery, to reduce a blockage was performed. This procedure was however flawed by frequent complications as well as early recurrence of a blockage. Major advancement in the intervention on coronary arteries, which when blocked significantly, lead to chest pains (angina) or to heart attacks, evolved in 1980s, when the first coronary stent was deployed. The first generation of such stents consisted of an expandable bare-metal cage which crushed the plaque into the sidewalls of the artery and kept an open lumen with improved blood flow.
Since that time, the technology has rapidly progressed to the current generation of drug-eluting stents and even absorbable scaffolds. Initially, with such technology, there was an enormous rise of such procedures performed, associated also with tremendous healthcare expenditures. Better understanding of indications and limitations of stents has evolved since. Undoubtedly, there have been many stents implanted for questionable indications with also questionable benefits. Presently, there are approximately 1 million of such procedures performed in the United States per year, and the implant criteria are well delineated and more stringent.
The primary indication for stents is in the acute coronary syndrome or acute heart attacks, which truly is a lifesaving procedure. It must be performed in a timely and highly efficient manner. Most hospitals have dedicated teams around-the-clock for such emergency situations.
On the other hand, indications for stent placements in patients who do not have acute unstable heart situation, are much more questionable. With this in mind, in 2017, based on a clinical trial, the media flooded the readers with sensational statements, and I quote the New York Times: "Unbelievable – heart stents failed to ease chest pain". Another article was titled "Heart stents are useless for most stable patients. They are still widely used”.
This sensationalism was based on short, small but interesting and challenging study (ORBITA) from England, when a stent was placed in one group of patients with "severe stenosis or blockage" as opposed to another group of patients, which underwent a sham procedure without a stent placement. These groups were on optimal medical treatment before, as well as after the procedure. Six weeks later, when compared for quality of life, intensity of chest pain and walking distance, there was no significant difference between the two groups regardless, whether they received a stent or underwent a sham procedure without a stent. So, logically, with only this information, one could conclude that stents are of no benefit.
However, on further sub-analysis of the study, it was evident, that patients with frequent episodes of chest pain benefited the most from a stent placement, and on ultrasound images (dobutamine stress echocardiography) it was apparent, that the heart segments, which received improved blood flow through a coronary stent, were functioning better, so the heart clearly was "happier". It was also of interest that on good medical therapy, some patients were chest pain free prior to undergoing their procedures. Thus, one would not expect further benefit from a stent. The question was then – are stents of value in relieving angina or chest pain, or is it the effect of a placebo in the control group. Placebo effect can be very powerful particularly early after initiation of therapy or a sham procedure.
In order to address the question of placebo effect versus resolution of angina symptoms by opening of an artery with a coronary stent, a second trial, ORBITA 2, was performed, however, at this time all patients were off most cardiac medications prior to undergoing such procedure, thus the potential medication effect was eliminated.
In this trial, the patients who were included were sicker with more blockages in the heart. 12 weeks later, not unexpectedly, the group which received the stent(s) implantation as opposed to the sham procedure, had significantly less chest pain or angina, and improved walking distance. Thus, this trial has proven that stents have a direct effect on clinical symptoms of chest pain beyond that of a placebo.
Although, no interventional cardiologist would have doubted that, we now have evidence, based on a clean clinical trial, that stents do work, even in stable patients, and their effect is beyond that of a placebo. It cannot however be denied, that medical therapy can be very powerful and effectively relieve angina symptoms without needing a coronary stent. One important caveat about stents in stable coronary patients is, that typically they do not prolong life. Few, so far relatively short clinical studies are showing possible reduction of heart attacks or hospitalizations for unstable symptoms, or even a reduction of mortality. The final jury on this is however still out.
In summary, coronary stents in patients with chest pain, when used judiciously in shared decision-making between the patient and the cardiologist can be of extraordinary value, particularly in patients, who are physically very active and experience despite medical therapy frequent episodes of chest pains, or are unwilling or unable to adhere to medical therapy recommendations.
So, prior to undergoing an interventional procedure, discuss with your cardiologist clearly, what the expectations and indications are, and be comfortable with the whole picture in your mind, rather than undergoing such procedure just under the premise that "my cardiologist recommends that”.
You hear it all the time and you read it in every magazine – eat fruits and vegetables for health and longevity. And in some tabloids you may read about specific fruits and their miraculous powers on health. Blueberries are often in the press, but why? They are rich in beneficial biological compounds called flavonoids. But with respect to blueberries, it is not only about flavonoids in general, but about anthocyanin in particular, as a subgroup in the flavonoid family.
Flavonoids are present in broccoli, tea, onions cocoa, red wine, and anthocyanins especially abundantly in colored berries. As a family of phytochemicals, they exert multiple biological mechanisms, most of them are quite beneficial for the vascular, cardiovascular and metabolic system.
In an six months feeding trial in which participants consumed along regular diet 1 cup of blueberries daily, there was a significant improvement in the health status of the arteries with improved elasticity and dilatation properties and increased high density lipoprotein (HDL), typically considered to be "the good cholesterol". Separate clinical studies pointed to a reduction of blood pressure, LDL (bad) cholesterol, as well as reduced inflammation, most likely mediated via corroboration with intestinal microbiota. (The colon is not just an elimination pipe, but a very biologically active "end-organ" which gives you much health benefits back for feeding it right).
In an interesting clinical trial evaluating close to 100,000 middle-aged women, there was an 32% reduction of myocardial infarction in an observation period of 18 years. Although not all myocardial infarctions have the same underlying cholesterol hypothesis, nonetheless those findings are quite intriguing to incorporate diverse fruits and vegetables, and in particular mixed berries like blueberries, blackberries, elderberries and strawberries into the diet, feeling good about their vascular and cardiac protective effect.
It is important to realize, that just eating blueberries, but otherwise sitting on the couch, watching television, being inactive, smoking and having other unhealthy habits, will not be overcome by a cup of blueberries. Putting all of the healthy habits (as outlined by the American Heart Association in the "Life's essential 8" in a mixer along with blueberries, will provide you with great cardiovascular benefits.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.